Costumes on film and their anachronisms

There’s a brilliant thread on Ask Metafilter at the moment about anachronistic clothes, make-up and styling in period movies. You know the sort of thing I mean. Liz Taylor’s 1963-meets-Ancient-Egypt eyeliner in Cleopatra, for example:

Liz Taylor eye makeup in Cleopatra

Or Steve McQueen’s preppy casual wear in the Great Escape – khakis and a cut-off sweatshirt were apparently standard issue in German POW camps:

Steve McQueen in the Great Escape - preppy outfit
Hair and make-up is usually the prime offender. But don’t get me wrong, I love these kind of images. We all see through the prism of the era we live in. Even fashion revivals are stamped with the distinctive flavour of the decade – people seek out the Biba ’70s does 30s’ clothes not because they are exact copies of 1930s originals, but because have that 70s decadence and drapiness.

It may be impossible to know what Cleopatra was wearing when she clutched that snake to her bosom, but costume designers are entitled to have a good old guess, and make it relevant to contemporary audiences.

For example, how do you picture Tess of the D’Urbervilles? A simple, rustic-looking country lass with straw in her hair perhaps? Beauty parlours were rather thin on the ground in Hardy’s rural Wessex, to be fair. Well here’s what the 1920s thought:

1920s Tess of the D'Urbervilles

And I think this still from Little Women (my favourite sob-inducing Sunday afternoon film) perfectly encapsulates that early 90s shabby chic/Laura Ashley look.

Of course, some people go the other way and become completely obsessive about period detail. When Stanley Kubrick made Barry Lyndon, he not only made his lead actress stay out of the sun for 6 months to develop an 18th century pallor, he also lit much of the film using only candles. He had to use a special lens from NASA to pick up enough light.

Barry Lyndon lit by candlelight - Stanley Kubrick

But even so, if you had to guess from the image below which era this film was made in, wouldn’t you say there’s something a bit, well, 70s about it?

Costumes are always going to require tweaking to fit the age. People did wear some seriously wacky stuff in the past – I can’t believe some of the colours of the Victorian gowns in the V&A. I guess in my head the Victorians live in sepia, whereas in actual fact they were pioneers of neon (sort of).

To finish, here’s an example of the only time a costume in a film has really annoyed me – the gorgeous red dress Shosanna wears at the end of Inglourious Basterds. It keeps appearing in massive close-up, revealing that the centre back is finished with a big freaking INVISIBLE ZIP – in the 1940s! I don’t know why this irritated me so much when the rest of the film is so deliberately anachronistic, but it just really really did. Here’s the dress from the front as I couldn’t find a picture of the offending zip, perhaps proving that this issue didn’t annoy anyone else as much as me.

Have you ever noticed this sort of thing going on?

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Costumes on film and their anachronisms

  1. TheBigForest August 17, 2012 / 8:56 PM

    The one that gets me is films made in the late 60’s/ 70’s where the men always have long hair irrespective of the period of the film. The Railway Children, The Go-between, Women in Love all set in the victorian/edwardian period and the guys have hair like the Beatles! Always annoys me in a low key way!

  2. starryfishathome August 16, 2012 / 10:36 AM

    Yes, this always annoys me. There’s a film made in the late 60’s , Where Eagles Dare, set in WWII. Clint Eastwood is sporting a 50’s slicked back hairstyle, and the only female character has a beehive hairdo and 60’s eyeshadow and pale pink lipstick. Every time it comes on the TV I drive my DH wild complaining about it. It’s especially irritating as the plot and acting makes it worth watching!

    • yesilikethat August 16, 2012 / 12:42 PM

      I do find it amusing more than annoying, unless as you say it’s a really good film and the little inaccuracies just drive you mad! Will have to check out Where Eagles Dare. I think the 60s were particularly bad for this kind of thing…

  3. Molly August 16, 2012 / 3:02 AM

    I do notice the difference when there are multiple versions of the same film, but mostly I’m just admiring them!

  4. Maddie Flanigan August 16, 2012 / 1:22 AM

    yes… it’s always interesting to see how fashion, hair and makeup are portrayed for a certain time! I’m definitely just as picky as you!

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s